home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cict.fr!news
- From: bastide@cict.fr (RΘmi Bastide)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: NT not written with MFC
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 13:25:56 GMT
- Organization: LIS-Universite Toulouse I
- Message-ID: <30fa558b.16005612@news.cict.fr>
- References: <4cka82$rmm@news.tamu.edu> <4cs7le$963@ornews.intel.com> <4cumsj$o9t@btree.brooktree.com> <4d6abt$ra7@ornews.intel.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: linus.univ-tlse1.fr
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141
-
- thurman_b_miller@ccm2.hf.intel.com (Thurman Miller) wrote:
-
- ...
- >>>If you are planning on
- >>>writing applications for Windows or NT, I'd go with C++, strictly for
- >>>the MFC library (Microsoft Foundation Class) which is the same source
- >>>that Windows 95 & NT were written in.
- >
- >>Utter rubbish. Show me at least one Win95 or Win NT component written
- >>in MFC. Stop this mindless promotion of MFC, please. At least in the
- >>C++ newsgroup.
- Your replys seems very harsh to me.
- BTW try launching wordpad on win95 and looking at the copyright
- notice.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ...
-